- A Review of Wayne Grudem’s “Free Grace Theology: 5 Way it Diminishes the Gospel”, Part 2
- The Savoy Declaration of
- Search results for '" + $('#searchBox').val() + "'
- Heaven and Hell in Christian Thought
- Academic Tools
The interpretation of this observation is rooted in the parallel drawn in v. God can do to Israel whatever Yahweh chooses, just as the potter can the clay cf. Israel is not autonomous or independent, but is completely in the control of Yahweh. That is the nature of the relationship, which finally cannot be avoided or denied.
A Review of Wayne Grudem’s “Free Grace Theology: 5 Way it Diminishes the Gospel”, Part 2
The argument that follows, however, is much more subtle. Israel is not fated but can act in new ways. In light of both these affirmations, Judah is exhorted to choose carefully how it will act, for its future depends on its action. But the second theme, that Israel can take an initiative, violates the metaphor, for Israel has freedom that the clay does not have. The clay cannot challenge the potter, but Israel can act so that Yahweh will change.
The clay now can take no action free of the potter. There is no more time for turning. Judah has waited too long. Judah of course had had freedom of choice. But that freedom has now been forfeited through sustained resistance and stubbornness. The text is not interested in a theoretical question of free will. Rather, it addresses the pastoral reality that resistance to God practiced so long eventually nullifies the capacity to choose life.
Judah resolves to act autonomously, without reference to Yahweh. Such a refusal ends in death… the potter is not endlessly committed to working with this clay, if the clay is finally recalcitrant. The potter will finally quit, which means that the clay has no future. But again, it gets even worse for him.
Thus it is no surprise to see Piper completely avoid the journey Israel has taken from the first category of self-hardening to the consequential second category of judicial hardening. Does it mean God never truly desired or intended certain Jews to obtain salvation? Does it mean God was behind the scenes; actively engineering a plot to ensure the nation of Israel disobeyed him and failed in her call to be a light to the nations?
If not why does Paul quote O. We have been over much of this material already, but because Piper continues to repeat the same charges in various, nuanced forms it is necessary to deal with them thoroughly. The common thread that unites all these O. Paul imports this theme into Romans 11 because he rightly recognizes God is again judicially blinding Israel as a consequence for her own self-chosen blindness and intransigent un-teachableness.
However God can still call out for repentance and for ears to hear just like Jesus will later do in the N. Because Jesus knows not all Jews have succumbed to the spirit of implacable unbelief that defines their age. Some will respond— in fact many did Mark But generally speaking the time for extended patience and mercy on the nation has ended.creatoranswers.com/modules/hamilton/conocer-personas-chat.php
The Savoy Declaration of
The time for corporate judgment on the nation has come. A similar passage in Isaiah almost perfectly parallels the dire, spiritual condition of Israel in at the dawn of the N. But when blind sinners consider themselves already seeing, already holy, already righteous, there is little they can receive from God except discipline. The historical record on Israel is generally uniform on this point as it spans the two testament ages.
Jesus was both the light of the world and the rock of stumbling for those who reject that light to see. The Romans were blind. The Greeks were blind. The Pharisees were blind.
Jesus knew they were all blind, for that is why He came. It is not that God predetermined through a divine decree that they be blind. Rather God is judging their arrogance by judicially delivering them over to their own spiritual pride. Given that the religious classes rejected their need of light, pridefully professing their sight and righteousness according to the Law, they forfeited the only true light to see their true need. In other words we are greatly mistaken if we think it had to be this way—that it was divinely predestined.
Search results for '" + $('#searchBox').val() + "'
Jesus made it clear He came to seek and save the lost, bind up the broken hearted, set the oppressed free and restore sight to the blind. But like slaves refusing freedom because they proudly think they are masters, and terminally ill patients refusing treatment because they confidently think they are in perfect health, Jesus had no recourse except to judicially confirm the religious class in their own blindness and seek out others more responsive, teachable and humble.
Paul is not alone in his assessment of two, distinct corporate groups. It shows up repeatedly in the words of Christ.
Heaven and Hell in Christian Thought
The former group is awash in self-righteousness and pride and can receive nothing from the Lord. We will recall only one went home justified Lk. But as stated before, not all did. Not all had unbelieving hearts, calloused over by years of outward piety at the cost of inward confession and faith. They recognized the voice of God—their Good Shepherd—in the voice of Jesus in the new covenant and were thus drawn to Christ as naturally as sheep being drawn to the voice of their true shepherd.
- I Am An African: Favourite Africa Poems (Favourite Poems by Wayne Visser Book 1);
- EXCEL-erate Your Energy!.
- Nine Operations of Redemption?
- The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible | EWTN.
- Basic Christian Doctrine - Faith Bible Church Online.
Those who were already in a right relationship with the Father followed the Son because they recognized that the Son and the Father spoke in one voice. However Piper is presenting the fallacy of a non-sequitur. For God can both call out for repentance to some and judicially blind others because there are two principal groups of people God has in view:. Recognizing that both groups are in play in the N.
Jesus was always searching out hearts still willing to hear and listen. That is to say they never knew God, never knew his Father— ever!
Yet they arrogantly thought they did. Time and again Jesus warned the Pharisees He came to give light to those in darkness, but if they arrogantly say they see, but walk as if they are blind, their sin, which is the ultimate cause of their blindness, remains. Note the order. Paul does not say the veil is removed so that Jews can turn to Christ; it is removed when Jews turn to Christ. Paul already told us that too. They found the righteousness of covenant union that came through faith. Are they some mysterious, unknown group individually and unconditionally selected by God to not be saved before they were born?
One can only arrive at this conclusion by importing a 16 th century debate about the nature of predestination upon the text.
Such a debate is centuries removed from anything Paul is trying to say in Romans Thus they are hardened and blinded. But they are not hardened or blinded against Christ. They hardened within the context of rejecting Christ and remaining in the stiff and brittle, old wineskin of the former covenant passing away. To the extent they remain entrenched in unbelief in the old covenant is to the extent they are hardened and blinded within that covenant. It cannot be repeated enough. To the contrary. That is the reason Paul is adamant in saying it is through belief in the gospel that a Jew can be grafted in after being cut off.
As already mentioned, Paul conditions the removal of the veil on turning to the Lord.